Home E Regional Initiatives E European Union

European Union

The Competition and Innovation Lab has launched the European Initiative to gain a comprehensive understanding of regulation in the digital domain and innovation dynamics across various global regions. This initiative aims to amplify the perspectives of European nations, providing insights into their distinct economic landscapes and mutual relationships. European countries are at the forefront of trends in digital trade, competition policy, and intellectual property, necessitating nuanced and in-depth analyses.

The European Union is leading global efforts in digital trade agreements and data governance, notably playing a pivotal role in negotiating the first global rules on digital trade within the World Trade Organization (WTO). In digital platform regulation, the EU’s initiatives include the Digital Markets Act and the Digital Services Act, extending to artificial intelligence with the AI Act and discussions on the Standard Essential Patents Regulation. Furthermore, the EU is emphasizing alignment and coordination between market authorities to ensure consistency across various market sectors.

This chapter aims to facilitate debates and interactions among academics, policy officers from national and international organizations, and the private sector about a common regulatory toolbox. The goal is to enable supervisors and market authorities to develop best practices and avoid fragmented approaches. While European countries face similar challenges, significant differences among them must be taken into account. For instance, while the EU has begun to introduce new regulations to bring legal harmonization, Germany believes the European Commission should be empowered to impose remedies
after a sector inquiry.

Key questions for discussion during the European initiative include how market authorities can build coordination and institutional alignment to avoid redundancy and negative externalities. Additionally, the initiative will explore the integration of trade and competition policy at the cross-border level, recognizing that trade policy and domestic regulation are interconnected. Understanding the antitrust implications of trade rules, particularly in how the EU relates to China, the US, and the Global South, is crucial for shaping inclusive and effective policies.

This initiative underscores the importance of collaboration and tailored approaches in addressing the complex landscape of digital trade and innovation regulation within the European context, ultimately contributing to the development of more coherent and effective global policies.

CIL’s European Union Initiative Lead

Events

UNCTAD Conference

OECD Workshop

Advisory Board

Michal Gal

Michal Gal is Professor and Director of the Forum on Law and Markets at the Faculty of Law, University of Haifa, Israel. She was Visiting Professor at NYU, Georgetown, Melbourne and […]

Youlia Lozanova

Youlia Lozanova brings 20 years of experience in digital development, specializing in policy and regulation for the ICT sector and digital markets. Youlia leads ITU’s research and analysis on digital […]

LinkedIn LinkedIn

Damien Neven

Damien Neven is Professor of Economics at The Graduate Institute, Geneva and Academic Affiliate with Compass Lexecon. He is a distinguished academic economist with a record of publications in applied industrial […]

Kristina Nordlander

Kristina Nordlander has a leading EU antitrust, litigation and regulatory practice with a particular focus on big tech and life sciences. She has over two decades of experience representing clients […]

LinkedIn LinkedIn

Xavier Vives

Xavier Vives is professor of Economics and Finance at IESE Business School. He holds a Ph.D. in Economics from UC Berkeley. He has taught at INSEAD, Harvard University, UAB, UPF, UC Berkeley, […]

LinkedIn LinkedIn

Eliana Garces

Eliana Garces is an economist and a consulting expert in the impact of new digital business models on markets, organization of value creation, and regulation.

LinkedIn LinkedIn

Konstantina Bania

Konstantina Bania is a partner at Geradin Partners where she advises on cutting-edge competition and regulatory matters pertaining to digital markets, including the implementation of the Digital Markets Act, the […]

LinkedIn LinkedIn

Paolo Buccirossi

Paolo Buccirossi is the director and founder of Lear, a consulting and research center specialized in competition economics. Paolo has worked in competition policy since 1994. After five years as an economic […]

LinkedIn LinkedIn

Josef Drexl

Josef Drexl is Director of the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition in Munich (since 2002), Honorary Professor at the University of Munich and Member of the Bavarian Academy […]

LinkedIn LinkedIn

Simon Evenett

Simon J Evenett is Professor of Geopolitics and Strategy at IMD. A globally recognized expert on trade, investment, and geopolitical dynamics, he is a leading analyst of the global business […]

LinkedIn LinkedIn

Our Research

Draft Technology Transfer Guidelines Further Show that the Future Markets Model is the Administrable Framework for Protecting Innovation

1. Confirms Previous Submission to Commission I write to explain why the draft Guidelines to the Technology Transfer Block Exemption…

One Digital Euro, Many Devices: Transplanting Interoperability Obligations

Working Paper about expanding OTC drug access through innovation.

Policy Note on Revising the Horizontal Merger Guidelines: Balancing Consumer Welfare, Innovation, and Market Competitiveness

Introduction The notion of concentration in competition law covers all operations that result in a lasting change in the control…

Future Markets Model is the Administrable Framework for Protecting Innovation

Guide Through Fifteen Articles From the cases the Commission has actually decided I have derived the administrable framework the Commission…

Competition for Competition: What Practitioners Expect from Competition Authorities with Leadership Ambitions

Competition authorities have regularly expressed desires to be leaders in their field. Such expressions range from one-off comments made in…

Collective Dominance Under Scrutiny: Closing the Enforcement Gap or Complicating EU Competition Policy?

his paper examines the European Commission’s Draft Guidelines on Article 102 TFEU, focusing on their treatment of collective dominance in…

Unlocking Manufacturer Utopia: AI’s Role in Perfect Price Discrimination

The development of Artificial Intelligence and the growing use of algorithms to optimize prices have generated significant debate about their…

Competition Law in Limbo: Intel, Fidelity Rebates, and the Price of a Procedural Error

The latest judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Intel case confirmed the General Court’s…

The European Commission’s Draft SEP Regulation: A Slippery Slope or a Renewed Hope?

Standards have long been considered the building blocks of innovation, and central to the standardization process are patents that protect…

The As-Efficient Competitor Test: A Cornerstone or a Controversy in EU Competition Law?

Initially published at Oxford Competition Law Insight, December 2024.  I. Introduction The As-Efficient Competitor (AEC) test has long been a focal…